UK has 'nothing to gain' from Brexit, says new report

Written by Martin Banks on 16 December 2016 in News

The UK has "nothing to gain" from leaving the EU, according to a major new report.

The UK has "nothing to gain" from leaving the EU, according to a major new report | Photo credit: Press Association

This is one the main findings of the 2016 Euro Plus Monitor, the authoritative bi-annual competitiveness ranking published at a news conference in Brussels on Wednesday by the Lisbon Council and Berenberg.

The report says that Britain "already benefits" from light-touch regulation.

"Its problems," says the report, "lie in policy areas such as macroeconomic management and the housing market over which the EU has little influence."


It comes as EU leaders converged on Brussels on Thursday for a one-day summit which will discuss Brexit.

The study ranks EU countries based on their fundamental health and adjustment progress in a "unique" double indicator. 

This year, the model is expanded and updated to cover all 28 EU member states and includes special chapters on Brexit and the economic risks of "populism."

The findings come as former UK Liberal MEP Andrew Duff urged EU leaders meeting on Thursday to provide "clarity" on the Brexit process.

Duff, now a visiting fellow at the Brussels based European Policy Centre think tank, said, "The meeting of the 27 EU leaders over dinner on Thursday is their first chance to have a real political debate about Brexit since the summer.

"In the absence of any clear signal from London about where the UK wants to go when it leaves the EU, the summit debate will inevitably be more about process than content. Yet clarity about process on the EU side would be very helpful, especially as the British end of Brexit is embroiled in legal and parliamentary battles."

Duff, an arch federalist, said the summit should consider a range of options including the possibility of a "complete change of heart and mind" by the British on Brexit.

He added, "This would only really be possible after an emergency general election in which an avowedly pro-EU government replaced that of Theresa May. Neither an early election nor such an alternative administration is in prospect.

"But these are questions which the European Council would be wise to reflect on as it turns its serious attention to the business of Brexit," said Duff, who was a Liberal MEP from 1999-2014. 


About the author

Martin Banks is a senior reporter for the Parliament Magazine

Interested in this content?

Sign up to our free daily email bulletins.


Share this page



Related Articles

Brexit talks: EU and UK accused of prioritising lobbyists over civil society
15 December 2017

Both the EU and UK have been condemned for “side-lining” concerns of civil society in the Brexit talks by allegedly granting “extremely privileged access to corporate lobbyists.”

Issue 467 | 18 December 2017
15 December 2017

Eva Maydell interview, Bulgarian EU Council Presidency Preview, ITER, 5G & Artificial Intelligence, Brexit breakthrough, Afrophobia, Inland waterways, EU-Israel, Aviation, 5...

Related Partner Content

Peregrine falcon down-listing an opportune time to reflect on CITES convention
23 September 2016

The Peregrine falcon's down-listing is an opportune time to reflect on the CITES convention, writes Adrian Lombard.

New anti-dumping rules: Three ways MEPs should stand up for EU manufacturers
14 June 2017

MEPs should stand up for EU manufacturers by adding legal certainty to the EU’s new anti-dumping methodology, writes Inès Van Lierde.

The need to counter extremist propaganda more effectively
13 December 2016

There are different reasons why people believe in extremist ideologies or join extremist groups, explains Alexander Ritzmann.