Petition urges EU governments to adopt European environmental standards

Written by Martin Banks on 7 April 2017 in News
News

A new report says that effective air pollution limits could save more than 20,000 lives every year even though national governments are said to be threatening to veto EU measures to tackle toxic pollution.

Pollution | Photo credit: Press Association


A petition calls on governments to protect citizens' health and the environment by adopting a European environmental standards document called the 'revised LCP BREF'. 

The petition also demands that governments protect their citizens' health by imposing strict limits on toxic pollution from coal. 

A recent report has shown how new pollution limits could help reduce the annual number of premature deaths caused by burning coal from 22,900 to 2600 deaths. 

The new standards are the result of years of negotiations between government, industry and NGO representatives. Their adoption was expected to be a formality but pressure from industry has led various member states to threaten to veto the new rules at the final hurdle. 

Environmental groups the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) and WWF have teamed up with campaigning organisation WeMove.EU to launch the petition. 

The petition will be delivered to national governments a week before a crucial vote by national governments on 28 April. 

Commenting, Christian Schaible, policy manager (EEB) and member of the group that provided technical advice on the new standards, said, "The tried-and-tested techniques described in the document have been demonstrated as technically and economically viable in plants across Europe for many years. In terms of pollution reduction, this is much more like 'using the wheel' than trying to reinvent it. 

"Given the serious cost of inaction on this issue, it is scandalous that certain governments may attempt to block these evidence-based standards that are designed to protect the health of their citizens and the environment."

Julia Gogolewska, of the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) said, "The health damage resulting from coal fumes today is neither necessary nor inevitable because the means to reduce this pollution already exist."

She added, "The new regulation will finally require polluters to bear some of the costs that are currently forced on society in the form of illness, health services and lifetime lost."

 

About the author

Martin Banks is a senior reporter for the Parliament Magazine

Interested in this content?

Sign up to our free daily email bulletins.

 

Share this page

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

Issue 462 | 09 October 2017
16 October 2017

Cécile Kashetu Kyenge Interview, Gender Equality, Health and Safety, Future of Food, Spirit Drinks Regulation, Brexit, Energy Labelling, Plastics Strategy, 5 questions with Antanas Guoga and more...

Farmers need closer cooperation with food supply chain
10 October 2017

Agriculture is under increasing pressure both to produce more food, and preserve the environment, writes Paolo De Castro.

Food safety: EU must build on its strengths
10 October 2017

Improving food safety has been a continuous process for the EU, and it must build on its strengths in this area, says Adina Vălean.

Related Partner Content

PM+: EU urged to implement action plan on illegal wildlife trade
22 April 2015

The Born Free Foundation's Will Travers argues that EU policymakers must move quickly to stem the tide of the growing global trade in wildlife trafficking.

Burning wood for residential heating must not hinder fight against air pollution
6 April 2016

Policymakers must focus their attention on developing advanced technologies in the battle against air pollution, argue the Lombardy Regional Environmental Protection Agency's Silvia Anna...

Will the EU phosphate fertilizer industry be a cadmium casualty?
29 May 2017

Paloma Pérez Sánchez and Pierre Jaouen on why they believe a cadmium limit of 80 mg strikes the right balance between health and environmental risk, and the EU's agricultural, geopolitical, and...