New findings highlight benefits of good safety and health at work
New findings highlight the benefits to be gained from good safety and health at work, writes Christa Sedlatschek.
Christa Sedlatschek | Photo credit: EU-OSHA
The human costs of poor or non-existent occupational safety and health (OSH) are often self-evident. When we hear of someone whose quality of life has changed for the worse because of an injury sustained while doing their job, or when we meet someone whose parent has died from occupational cancer, we feel a strong sense of the wasted opportunity to prevent suffering.
However, some costs are less easy to understand, and these are the costs to society at a macroeconomic level.
At the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) we believe that more and better information on this issue will help policymakers to take more targeted and effective action on risks to workers.
- Work without fear: EU should do more to protect workers' health and safety
- Thomas Mann: Sunday work is a danger to our health and safety
However, this information needs to be accurate, accessible and country-relevant.
This was the thinking behind our major new project on estimating the costs and benefits associated with OSH, which we are working on in collaboration with the International Labour Organisation and the governments of Finland and Singapore, among other partners. We wanted to answer the question ‘What impact does a lack of good OSH have on the economy?’
We presented the first results of the project at the XXI World Congress on Safety and Health at Work in Singapore recently, and they can be explored using a data visualisation tool on the Agency’s website.
The findings highlight the importance of OSH for Europe’s societies and economies and illustrates the advantages that can be gained by reducing workers’ exposure to hazardous conditions.
Work-related ill-health and injury is costing the European Union 3.3 per cent of its GDP. This is equivalent to an annual cost of around €476bn.
Worldwide, the figure is 3.9 per cent, or €2,680bn. In the EU alone, more than seven million disability-adjusted life years (DALY) are lost annually because of work-related diseases, injuries and fatalities. DALYs are used to measure the burden of disease; taking into account years lost because of ill health, disability and death.
Work-related illness accounts for 98 per cent of all deaths related to work in the EU, and in most member states, the majority of the costs of work-related illness (€119.5bn) are due to work-related cancer.
As a result of these findings, the economic case for good OSH is stronger than ever, and work on the project will continue with the development of a sophisticated economic costing model, to be published in 2019.
Policymakers are in a position to encourage better management of OSH risks and to move the EU towards ‘zero harm at work’.
The benefits are clear: reduced healthcare costs, more efficient working methods using innovative technology, and a lesser burden on society from caring for people with work-related disabilities or chronic illnesses.
Every effort invested in OSH, by public or private organisations, generates a significant economic return, as our project demonstrates.
This content is published by the Parliament Magazine on behalf of our partners.
MEPs Ole Christensen, Jutta Steinruck and Paloma López Bermejo talk to the Parliament Magazine about the importance of strong health and safety at work rules.
European Week of Regions and Cities 2017, Karl-Heinz Lambertz Interview, Future of Europe, Erasmus, Corina Creţu interview, Cohesion Policy, RegioStars, Regional Focus on Brittany, Markku Markkula...
Cécile Kashetu Kyenge Interview, Gender Equality, Health and Safety, Future of Food, Spirit Drinks Regulation, Brexit, Energy Labelling, Plastics Strategy, 5 questions with Antanas Guoga and more...
The European Commission's Pillar of Social Rights initiative must include proposals to counter the negative impact EU economic governance rules, says Eduardo Chagas.
In today’s highly diversified and segmented labour market, how can we ensure that access to social protection is balanced across all types of worker, asks Denis Pennel.
Early intervention is a cost-effective solution to reducing the burden of musculoskeletal disorders, writes Juan Jover.