How can lightweight materials such as aluminium help the EU meet its CO2 emissions reduction targets?

Written by Patrik Ragnarsson & Dieter Höll on 18 April 2017 in Opinion Plus
Opinion Plus

EU legislation needs to recognise the advantages lightweight materials can offer in reducing CO2 emissions from vehicles, write Patrik Ragnarsson and Dieter Höll.

Can Aluminium lightweighting in cars help reduce CO2 emissions? | Photo credit: Fotolia


In July 2016, the European Commission set out its strategy for low-emission mobility. A key objective - reducing CO2 emissions by 2050 by at least 60 per cent from 1990 levels - already looks challenging considering the growing demand for mobility worldwide. Therefore, it is important we make full use of all available technologies and materials that can put us on track.

By making cars and vans lighter, conventional vehicles will use less fuel and emit fewer emissions. Lighter electric vehicles can travel further on the same amount of charge reducing vehicle-linked emissions. Importantly, lightweighting confers this benefit to all types of vehicles without compromising safety.

Aluminium plays a pivotal role in this lightweighting process; its unique properties mean it is already widely deployed in automotive manufacturing; the average European car currently uses 150 kg of aluminium.


RELATED CONTENT


Given the right encouragement, this could increase to 200 kg by 2025, delivering a consequent reduction in CO2 emissions and fuel savings. Lightweighting through aluminium use offers a real opportunity to accelerate the shift towards low-emission mobility.

Given the advantages offered by lightweighting, Europe should embrace this opportunity to decarbonise the transport sector. We believe there are a number of options for action that will help realise the potential of lightweight solutions such as aluminium.

The next revision of the CO2 standards for cars and vans presents an opportunity to correct the negative effects of basing targets on the mass of the vehicles. The current system no longer makes sense from either environmental or cost-effect points of view.

Firs, because heavier vehicles are currently permitted higher CO2 emissions than lighter ones. Second, since car manufacturers don’t realise the full benefit of their investment in lightweighting, as a lighter car has to comply with tougher targets over time. The mass-based system has a perverse effect of discouraging solutions that contribute directly to reducing CO2 emissions.

However, a switch to a footprint-based approach, based on a vehicle’s size rather than its weight, would increase the appeal of lightweighting and encourage manufacturers to explore the full range of options for boosting fuel efficiency.

Additionally, it would be less expensive for manufacturers; a recent study has shown that adopting a footprint-based approach to achieving the 2025 CO2 target would be 16 per cent cheaper than the existing approach.

The positive impact on innovation should not be underestimated. The US routinely uses the vehicle footprint approach as the basis for its fuel efficiency legislation. This has already dramatically accelerated US investment in and deployment of lightweight technologies.

Lightweighting is a strategic priority for European car industry; insufficient encouragement to invest in research into this area could see any competitive advantage quickly lost.

Another option for phasing out the mass-based approach would be to apply the same percentage reduction in emissions to all manufacturers. This would allow manufacturers to choose the most cost-efficient approach.

Asking all individual manufacturer groups to reduce their emissions by a fixed percentage between 2021 and 2025 would allow manufacturers full flexibility to choose their CO2 reduction strategy. Lightweighting and engine efficiency improvement would be treated equally, ensure technology neutrality and increase cost-efficiency.

Lastly, we should also take into account the wider benefits of aluminium, most importantly its lifetime contribution to a circular economy. When a car has reached its end of its life, more than 90 per cent of its aluminium is recycled into new car components or other products while using only five per cent of the energy used in its primary production; a further significant contribution to reducing CO2.

The advantages of lightweighting are indisputable and in the case of aluminium, the technology is tried, tested and already available. EU policymakers should seize this opportunity to realise its potential.

About the author

Patrik Ragnarsson is Senior Manager Automotive & Transport Group at European Aluminium, the voice of the aluminium industry in Europe.

Dieter Höll is Chair of the Automotive & Transport Board at European Aluminium.

This topic will be discussed at the European Aluminium event Driving low carbon mobility to a low carbon future on 27 April in Brussels. For more information, read our position paper.

Share this page

Tags

Categories

Partner content

This content is published by the Parliament Magazine on behalf of our partners.

Related Articles

European Parliament discusses ETS
13 September 2017

On September 11, a debate took place on the EU Emissions Trading System at the European Parliament Plenary session in Strasbourg.

Issue 460 | 11 September 2017
12 September 2017

Corina Crețu Interview, Clean Energy, EU-Brazil trade, Biotech Week, Antimicrobial Resistance, Jobs and Growth, Copyright Reform, German Elections, 5 questions with Merja Kyllönen and more.

Dieselgate: Commission must step up to the plate, say Greens
8 September 2017

An estimated 25 million cars on Europe's roads are still non-compliant with EU emissions standards, it has been claimed.

Related Partner Content

EU ETS reform must acknowledge crucial differences between industries
30 May 2016

How to tier and where to tier? These are the key ETS reform questions that need answers, says Jacob Hansen.

Circular Economy targets: let’s measure what matters first
9 March 2017

To reach a true circular economy, MEPs should make it their top priority to set a single method for measuring ‘real’ recycling rates, write Axel Eggert, Sylvain Lhôte and Guy Thiran.

Effective ETS reform must resolve issue of indirect carbon costs compensation
24 May 2016

Ensuring compensation for indirect costs will be pivotal in making ETS work for power-intensive industries, argues Gerd Götz.