What's at stake for European energy post-Brexit?

Written by Iain Conn on 20 December 2016 in Thought Leader
Thought Leader

Iain Conn asks, what's at stake for European energy post-Brexit?

Iain Conn | Photo credit: Centrica

Emotions are running high around the UK's decision to leave the European Union after 43 years of membership. It will be a difficult negotiation but energy, like all cross-border network industries, should not be a zero-sum game. Both the UK and the EU would lose out if our energy relationship was put in question.

Why does Centrica care? We are a major North Sea producer, a power generator in nuclear and natural gas fired power, and the leading UK energy supplier. We own Bord Gáis Energy, one of Ireland's leading providers of gas, electricity, and energy services.

Our recent acquisitions, ENER-G and Neas Energy, operate in various member states. European cooperation has been mutually beneficial for the UK, for the EU and for Ireland. From the perspective of the UK, the internal energy market brings strong benefits for security of supply and competitiveness.


As an energy importer the UK is increasingly dependent upon European markets for the volume and price of natural gas and electricity. 

The UK also attracts significant inward investment from continental energy investors such as EDF, Siemens, Dong and Iberdrola. By being part of the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS), the UK has access to the best market mechanism for cost-efficient decarbonisation - although the price signal for carbon remains too low.

The UK's contribution to European energy is significant. The UK has been a driver of the internal energy market. UK-EU gas interconnectors provide an important gas import route to the EU, and the north-west European gas market works very well, to mutual advantage.

The UK has been the leader among G20 nations on climate action over the last 15 years, ranking first on the reduction of its overall carbon intensity. Other member states would need to step up their climate efforts if the UK was to exit EU effort-sharing arrangements. Ireland faces two particular energy challenges. 

First, access to the EU energy markets runs through the UK. If the UK is no longer part of the wider European energy market, Ireland risks energy isolation. Ireland is almost entirely dependent on gas from the UK for its supply and it also imports four per cent of its electricity from the UK system. 

Second, the operation of an "all-island" single electricity market between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland could become more difficult if the UK regulatory framework diverged significantly from EU rules post Brexit.

The best way to realise our three goals - competitiveness, security of supply and decarbonisation - is to keep working together. There are many difficult issues around Brexit, but energy and climate should not be one of them.


About the author

Iain Conn is Group Chief Executive of Centrica plc


Share this page



Partner content

This content is published by the Parliament Magazine on behalf of our partners.

Related Articles

MEP awards 2018: Judging panel announced
8 November 2017

The Parliament Magazine is proud to unveil the judging panel for the 2018 MEP awards.

Bio-based industry holds the key to circular economy
8 November 2017

BBI Executive Director Philippe Mengal outlines the numerous ways in which Europe’s bio-based industries are impacting on society.

COP23: Despite US withdrawal, Paris agreement is alive and well
6 November 2017

Now that the US has withdrawn from the Paris agreement, it’s up to the EU to step up and be the climate leader the world needs, writes Gilles Pargneaux.

Related Partner Content

EU Emissions Trading System must recognise those sectors unable to pass-on carbon costs
22 November 2016

The reformed ETS system must acknowledge the inability of non-ferrous metals, ferro alloys and silicon producers to pass-on regionally imposed carbon costs, write Guy Thiran, John Schoenenberg,...

PM+: CCS 'only proven technology' for transitioning to low-carbon future
28 March 2014

Graeme Sweeney says carbon capture and storage (CCS) is the only technological option which can cost-efficiently manage the transition to a low-carbon future.