Close the loop without knots

Written by CECED on 25 January 2017 in Press Release
Press Release

CECED reacts to Parliament's environment committee vote on the waste directive.

CECED reacts to Parliament's environment committee vote on the waste directive | Photo credit: CECED

Today, the European Parliament’s Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety voted on the draft reports of its Rapporteur MEP Simona Bonafè on Commission proposals amending the 2008 Waste Directive, the 2012 Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive and the 2006 Batteries and Waste Batteries Directive. These legislative proposals were part of the EU Circular Economy Package, announced in December 2015.

Says CECED Director-General, Paolo Falcioni:” I note a strong signal from the European Parliament to encourage the development of Europe’s Circular Economy. However, there are some aspects of the proposals that could cause distortions within the European Single Market, as well as negatively affect existing successful and efficient producer compliance operations. The home appliance industry continues to be fully committed to a workable waste legislation. The industry has a longstanding experience with e-waste legislation. Volumes of collected and properly recycled e-waste have steadily increased.”

A one-size-fits-all approach is not feasible when it comes to waste legislation. Sufficient flexibility is needed in the Waste Framework Directive to encompass national and waste stream specificities. The reports, as voted, risk jeopardising the equilibrium found when the WEEE Directive was revised in 2012 -  i.e.: on extended producer responsibility and on operational and financial responsibility of producers. Producers can only be financially responsible for aspects under their control or influence

Similarly, consistency with other EU and national pieces of legislation have not sufficiently been sought to ensure legal certainty and avoid contradictions, overlaps or double regulation. For instance, product design rules should not be addressed in waste legislation, which, by its very nature, provides for subsidiarity and is not intended to create a single market. This will create difficulties for a proper, efficient and full implementation of the existing EU waste legislation in the 28 Member States.

The home appliance industry acknowledges the efforts made by the Members of the European Parliament to clarify a number of issues. We particularly welcome the clarification of the preparing for re-use definition. The definition as voted today, contrary to the Commission proposal, does not create a mix between products and waste. This is complemented by the introduction of the ‘recognised preparing for re-use operator’ concept. Access conditions for recognised preparing for re-use operators can be improved at waste collection points under certain prerequisites and according to existing national and local legislations, as well as having robust standards in place.

We also very much welcome that there has been more emphasis in the voted text on the roles and responsibilities of all actors handling waste in the Waste Framework Directive. This has been complemented by the introduction in the WEEE Directive of the obligations for Member States to ensure that data from all actors collecting or treating WEEE is reported.

Mr Falcioni concluded: “These changes send a positive signal acknowledging that there is a market for WEEE and it has a value. Without taking measures to reduce waste leakage and ensuring fully implemented EU treatment standards, a transition to a circular economy will remain incomplete.”


About the author

Emile Stumpf, Environment Policy Manager
Tel: +32 (0)2 738 7815

Tristan Macdonald, Communication Manager
Tel: +32 (0)2 738 78 19

CECED's annual report



Share this page



Partner content

This content is published by the Parliament Magazine on behalf of our partners.

Related Articles

EU reopens discussions on glyphosate approval
20 July 2017

The EU’s standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed has met to discuss the European Commission's proposal to renew the licence for the use of glyphosate in the EU for 10 years.

Fertilising regulation: Balancing human health and innovation
10 July 2017

Updating the fertilizers regulation must not be used as an excuse for a backdoor revision of the nitrates directive, warns Marc Tarabella.

EU must break down barriers to free movement of innovative fertilizers
10 July 2017

Europe must break down barriers to the free movement of innovative fertilizers, writes Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz.

Related Partner Content