New EU low-carbon economy proposals criticised for lacking ambition

Written by Martin Banks on 22 July 2016 in News
News

'Words won’t fool melting glaciers', warn environmental campaigners.

Climate change

The European Commission has been accused of failing to live up to EU climate change promises and commitments | Photo credit: Press Association


Newly-announced EU efforts to tackle climate change across the EU “fall far short” of commitments made at international talks in Paris last year.

The attack comes after the European commission unveiled new proposals on Wednesday on how to distribute the goal of cutting emissions of least 40 per cent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels among the EU's 28 member states.

The draft 'effort sharing' legislation sets out the emissions reductions now required by all member states until 2030 in sectors not covered by the EU’s emissions trading scheme.

On Wednesday, the commission also presented a “strategy” on low and zero-emission vehicles and alternative low-emissions fuels.


RELATED CONTENT


A commission spokesman said the package “will steer Europe's low-carbon transition and respond to the commitments made by EU countries under the Paris Agreement on climate change.”

But the proposals met with a decidedly lukewarm response in some quarters.

Dutch MEP Bas Eickhout, a member of the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament, said, "The Commission is failing to live up to the promises and commitments made by the EU on climate change.

“With the ink hardly dry on the UN climate agreement, the commission is acting as if the COP21 Paris climate summit never happened.

"The proposed national effort sharing targets for emissions reductions to 2030 are clearly below the level they need to be at if the EU is to play its part in meeting the goal of limiting the increase in global temperatures to well below 2°C and to try and limit the increase to below 1.5°C..

Eickhout, the Greens/EFA group's climate change policy spokesperson added, "If the EU is serious about addressing the problem, it urgently needs to increase the ambition of today’s proposal.”

"The commission's proposals include various loopholes, which will undermine the effectiveness of these rules in delivering actual emissions reductions.”

Eickhout added, “Scandalously, EU member states could also use surplus allowances from the EU’s emissions trading scheme (ETS) to offset emissions reductions in sectors outside the ETS, instead of actually reducing their emissions.

"Instead of abusing the surplus of permits that is undermining the ETS, the EU should simply cancel these permits and remove the 'hot air' from the malfunctioning system. Anything else would clearly not help tackle climate change."

Elsewhere, Friends of the Earth Europe was also critical, disputing the Commission’s climate figures, arguing that signatories of the Paris Agreement committed to limiting temperature increases to well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C.

With the current plan, Europe is on track to a 2-2.4°C temperature increase, it warned.

Brook Riley, climate justice and energy campaigner for Friends of the Earth Europe said: “The EU’s climate plan promises far from Europe’s fair share in the fight against climate change – and everyone knows it. Words won’t fool melting glaciers, and only action can save those impacted by climate change. European and national policymakers need to stop presenting climate policy as a cost and start underlining its huge environmental and economic benefits.”

The Commission also courted controversy over its “lack of action” on tar sands and its continued support for gas in the transport sector, which environmental campaigners claim risks locking Europe into decades of fossil fuel use.

Colin Roche, extractives campaigner for the group, said: “Europe must end its addiction to fossil fuels, including in the transport sector. There is a gaping tar-sands shaped hole in this strategy – it does not stop the dirtiest fossil fuel on earth entering Europe’s fuel mix and threatening Europe’s transition to low-carbon transport.”

The group is calling on the commission to “do more, and to focus on the benefits of higher emissions reduction targets, and investment in renewables and energy efficiency.”

Further comment came from environmental campaign groups Carbon Market Watch and Transport & Environment whose EU policy director Femke de Jong said, “Worryingly, the proposal includes loopholes that put the real-world delivery of the EU’s climate pledge at serious risk.

“This is the first test since the signing of the Paris Agreement and the EU cannot afford it to let it fail. The 2030 target for the non-traded sectors is only 30 per cent which is not in line with the goal to limit global warming to 1.5°C."

About the author

Martin Banks is senior reporter at the Parliament Magazine

Interested in this content?

Sign up to our free daily email bulletins.

 

Share this page

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

MEP Awards 2017 MEP awards 2017: A few words from the winners
23 March 2017

Maltese deputy Roberta Metsola hosted the Parliament Magazine's annual MEP awards ceremony recognising MEPs for their outstanding work over the last year.

Markku Markkula EU energy policy should focus on local resources
24 March 2017

The EU's energy ambition has great potential, and Europe’s cities and regions are ready to deliver, writes Markku Markkula.

Morten Helveg Petersen Energy union is on the right track: It's time to deliver
22 March 2017

A major challenge lies ahead in achieving the right level of ambition and coordinating the political debate and legislative process of the winter package, writes Morten Helveg Petersen.

Related Partner Content

Electricity Fixing ETS indirect costs: Why a smart hybrid model is the best solution
8 September 2016

MEPs have a golden opportunity to fix ETS indirect carbon costs compensation, but achieving their ambition will require that they go the extra mile, write Guy Thiran and Gerd Götz.

Recycling Circular Economy targets: let’s measure what matters first
9 March 2017

To reach a true circular economy, MEPs should make it their top priority to set a single method for measuring ‘real’ recycling rates, write Axel Eggert, Sylvain Lhôte and Guy Thiran.