Over the past decade, the European Union and its member states have steadily expanded their focus on the Indo-Pacific, recognising it as a key arena where global order, economic flows, and security norms are reshaped. France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the EU have all unveiled Indo-Pacific strategies, and European naval deployments to the region have become increasingly routine.
Yet Europe’s growing presence risks falling short of its promise. The absence of a unified narrative weakens its voice, leaving partners in the region wondering whether European engagement is more symbolic than substantive.
To succeed, Europe must close the gap between ambition and capacity — anchoring its initiatives in strategic coherence, credible resources, and partnerships that genuinely strengthen the regional order.
Strategic clarity central to EU success in the Indo-Pacific region
Europe’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific is underpinned by very real stakes. At its core, Europe is stepping up to keep global trade flowing through the world’s busiest sea lanes, to defend rules such as freedom of navigation and the peaceful resolution of disputes, to reduce its overreliance on Chinese markets and supply chains, and to show that it is willing to shoulder global responsibility.
But the absence of a unified narrative hampers Europe’s voice. France emphasises sovereignty and regional presence as a resident power, Germany stresses rules-based order and multilateralism, while the EU frames its approach around “cooperation, not confrontation.” Such pluralism reflects Europe’s diversity, but it risks incoherence in the eyes of Indo-Pacific partners who value consistency and credibility.
If Europe does not spell out what it really wants to do — for example, pushing back against coercion in the South China Sea, helping partners strengthen their navies, or being ready to respond together in a regional crisis — then its efforts will look more like gestures than serious commitments.
Strategic clarity does not mean full alignment among the 27 EU member states, but it does require identifying common denominators and setting achievable goals.
From symbolic deployments to sustained presence
Naval deployments by European states — for example, the French frigate Surcouf sailing through the South China Sea in 2021, the German frigate Bayern visiting ports in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore, or the Dutch frigate Tromp joining U.S. and Japanese vessels in 2024 — have been visible demonstrations of solidarity with regional partners such as Japan, South Korea, Australia, and ASEAN states in the face of growing Chinese maritime assertiveness and North Korean provocations. Yet these occasional “flag-showing” missions are insufficient to influence the strategic balance.
To succeed, Europe must institutionalise its presence in ways that regional actors can depend upon. This could take the form of rotational naval deployments, joint patrols with regional partners, or regular participation in multilateral exercises like RIMPAC. The EU’s Coordinated Maritime Presences (CMP) initiative — already active in the Gulf of Guinea — offers a template.
Extending CMP to the Indo-Pacific, starting with the Indian Ocean or the South China Sea, would allow Europe to project continuity without overextending scarce naval resources.
Without such sustained efforts, Europe risks being remembered for episodic gestures rather than enduring contributions.
The EU must establish partnerships, not alternatives
Europe will never match US military power in the Indo-Pacific, nor should it aim to. Europe’s value lies in reinforcing alliances and partnerships that already underpin regional security.
By aligning with the US hub-and-spokes system — anchored by alliances with Japan, South Korea, Australia, the Philippines, and security ties with Taiwan — Europe can strengthen the credibility of deterrence in the region without having to create duplicate networks of its own.
At the same time, partnerships with like-minded middle powers — such as Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, and Taiwan — allow Europe to broaden its role beyond simply “following Washington.”
For example South Korea’s deepening of security cooperation with the EU, which was formalised in the 2024 Security and Defence Partnership, demonstrates that Europe can carve out a meaningful role. Joint work on maritime domain awareness, cyber resilience, and sanctions enforcement against North Korea illustrates how Europe can complement, rather than compete with, US alliances.
Similarly, cooperation with ASEAN on capacity-building and with Australia on defence industry resilience enhances Europe’s profile while serving local needs. The key is humility and pragmatism: Europe must present itself as a partner that adds depth to the regional security architecture, not as an alternative to US guarantees.
Economic security as strategic security
The Indo-Pacific region is not just a military theatre — it is a hub of global trade, technology supply chains, and energy routes. For Europe, securing the Indo-Pacific is inseparable from securing economic resilience. Europe’s recent overdependence on Russian energy should serve as a warning against excessive reliance on Chinese markets and supply chains.
Success in the Indo-Pacific requires Europe to invest in economic security: diversifying critical supply chains, building resilient digital infrastructure, and promoting high standards in trade and investment.
The EU–Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, the EU–South Korea Free Trade Agreement, and ongoing talks with ASEAN countries are not only commercial deals but also strategic tools. Linking economic frameworks with security initiatives ensures Europe’s engagement has tangible stakes for regional partners.
Navigating the US–China rivalry
A critical challenge is how Europe positions itself amid an intensifying US–China rivalry. Washington expects Europe to align more explicitly with its Indo-Pacific strategy, while Beijing warns against “external interference.”
Europe’s success will lie in aligning firmly with the principles of international law and open sea lanes, without appearing as a mere extension of US containment.
This balancing act requires Europe to sharpen its narrative: Europe is not choosing sides, but defending rules that benefit all. When European vessels conduct freedom of navigation operations, they must be framed as pro-law actions, not anti-China manoeuvres. Europe’s economic engagement with Southeast Asia should highlight inclusivity rather than confrontation.
If Europe fails to maintain this balance, it risks alienating regional partners who seek autonomy in navigating great-power rivalry.
Investing in capabilities and political will
Europe’s Indo-Pacific ambitions will stand or fall on resources. Naval deployments require ships, crews, and budgets — assets already stretched by EU commitments in the Mediterranean, Baltic, and Black Sea. Without credible investments, Europe’s Indo-Pacific agenda risks being dismissed as strategic tourism.
Political will is equally crucial. European publics and parliaments must be persuaded that the Indo-Pacific is integral to Europe’s own prosperity and security, not a distraction from pressing challenges in Ukraine or the Middle East.
The pandemic revealed the fragility of supply chains — disruptions in the Taiwan Strait or South China Sea would hit European economies directly. Policymakers must communicate this reality clearly if they expect taxpayers to fund far-flung missions.
A realistic vision for success
Europe cannot transform the Indo-Pacific order, but it can play a meaningful role if it grounds its ambitions in realism and coherence. Strategic clarity, sustained presence, strong partnerships, economic-security linkages, and credible resourcing together form the conditions for success.
Europe’s engagement should be judged by whether it contributes to preserving open sea lanes, upholding rules, supporting partners, and strengthening transatlantic and trans-regional security ties, not by whether it matches US firepower or outpaces China’s reach.
If Europe delivers on these areas, its Indo-Pacific engagement will reinforce its credibility as a global security actor. Failure to do so would consign Europe to being a marginal voice — present in rhetoric, absent in reality.
Sign up to The Parliament's weekly newsletter
Every Friday our editorial team goes behind the headlines to offer insight and analysis on the key stories driving the EU agenda. Subscribe for free here.