EU Commission circular economy package is waste of a year

Written by Josu Juaristi Abaunz on 1 February 2016 in Opinion
Opinion

The new circular economy package has some positives, but lacks the elements needed to implement systemic change, argues Josu Juaristi Abaunz.

Last December, the European Commission finally presented its long-awaited circular economy package.

Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker's team claimed, again and again, that it was 'more comprehensive and ambitious' than its withdrawn predecessor - as if simply repeating the words would make it so.

In my opinion, the college's assessment of its package is far from justified. The proposals lack ambition in terms of their objectives, but also in terms of measures and implementation, in a way that reduces their potential to drive a systemic change.


RELATED CONTENT


Yet systemic change is what we really need in order to transition from a linear to a truly circular economy.

The legislative package does have some positive elements - there is no doubt about it - but I honestly think that we have wasted a year since it was initially presented and later withdrawn. Generally, it is less ambitious on waste management, prevention, reuse and recycling targets - to name a few.

Places such as Gipuzkoa (Basque country), Ljubljana (Slovenia) and Contarina (Italy), have shown it is perfectly possible to achieve recycling rates of 70 per cent, as well as a substantial reduction of waste in under 10 years - all while creating jobs.

Therefore, it could have been completely feasible for the Commission to present more ambitious targets in December.

Regarding incineration, the legislative package clearly states there will be investment in incinerators that are not absolutely justified, and that new ones would only be built 'in exceptional cases'.

This is a good thing, but it makes no sense that some of the action plan's measures have wide timeframes, and that given the experiences described, the objectives of prevention, reuse, selective collection of biowaste and recycling have not been taken into account with greater ambition. We can do so much more.

 

About the author

Josu Juaristi Abaunz (ES) is Parliament's GUE/NGL group shadow rapporteur on waste management

Categories

Interested in this content?

Sign up to our free daily email bulletins.

 

Share this page

Tags

Categories

Related Partner Content

The Emperor’s new clothes
16 October 2017

It’s neither wise nor safe for EU policymakers to dismiss new breeding techniques as ‘dangerous’ without any real consideration of the facts, argues Hannes Kollist.

EU must future-proof legislation for animal health
29 January 2018

Animal Health Europe’s Roxane Feller provides a recap on the veterinary medicines and medicated feed review ahead of trilogue talks kicking-off this week on 31 January