TTIP must not 'wipe out' social and health rights in Europe

Written by Emma Woodford, Conny Reuter, Pierre Baussand and Jan Willem Goudriaan on 25 June 2014 in News

An EU-US trade agreement 'may seriously weaken' vital public services.

EU-US flags

Next month the European commission will host a sixth round of EU-US trade talks on the transatlantic trade and investment partnership (TTIP): a free trade agreement that will eventually affect around 40 per cent of global trade by bringing together the world’s two largest trading blocs.

At first glance, the enormity of this deal should be good news for people living in Europe given that further integration of transatlantic businesses could bring job opportunities and better consumer choices. Yet, without a swift change of direction in the way this deal is being negotiated, TTIP could wipe out hard-fought milestones in social protection at the stroke of a pen.

The partnership’s possible impacts on social and health services could be dramatic. Despite the European commission’s promises that there will be no ‘race-to-the-bottom’ to lower standards, there have been contradictory messages about whether  public services - including social and health services - are excluded from the ongoing negotiations.

Reckless liberalisation of the EU-US trade, services and investments market may seriously weaken the provision of vital public services. The EU seems to be aware of the need to provide protection to social and health services, but it seems that a considerable number of member states are seeking to remove rules that underpin universal access to quality services.

Particularly worrying is the inclusion of an investor-state-dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism - a highly technical component of this agreement that can leave EU member states at the mercy of international firms as corporations become empowered to sue governments outside the legal system for regulations that may impinge on future profits.

The ISDS may also cause a regulatory freeze across Europe as public authorities become reluctant to pass regulations that might affect transatlantic trade.

"The evident lack of transparency that characterises the TTIP talks is casting a long shadow over these negotiations"

The evident lack of transparency that characterises the TTIP talks is casting a long shadow over these negotiations. Without adequate civil society monitoring, the final version of the TTIP will resemble a pact among big corporations with little regard for public interest. As a starting point, the commission should publish the negotiating texts so that Europeans know what is being decided on our behalf.

We are not alone in thinking this. Article 14 of the EU treaty, the EU charter on fundamental rights and the overarching EU objective to reach a “social market economy” were established precisely to prevent the kind of blow to people’s rights that TTIP is threatening to strike. Indeed, there has been little, if any, formal investigation into the social and health impacts of the agreement.

For decades the European Union has worked shoulder to shoulder with its Member states to establish the world’s highest safeguards in terms of consumer protection and people’s social and labour rights. This includes quality standards in public procurement which are now under threat as they could be regarded as non-tariff barriers to trade and risk removal.

"The TTIP is setting a precedent on how future trade negotiations are dealt with, making it all the more important that the commission and member states understand that health and social services cannot be run as a business"

The TTIP is setting a precedent on how future trade negotiations are dealt with, making it all the more important that the commission and member states understand that health and social services cannot be run as a business.

Economic growth and job creation should not and will not be achieved at the expense of social rights and the undermining of the EU’s welfare state model, in which solidarity and services in the general interest play a key role.

As Europeans signalled in last month’s elections, a Europe that does not put people’s rights and interests in the driving seat of policy making is a Europe that very few citizens will support.

About the author

Emma Woodford is interim secretary general at the European Public Health Alliance (EPHA)
Conny Reuter is secretary general at Solidar
Pierre Baussand is director of Social Platform
Jan Willem Goudriaan is general secretary at EPSU


Interested in this content?

Sign up to our free daily email bulletins.


Share this page



Related Articles

MEP Awards 2017 MEP awards 2017: A few words from the winners
23 March 2017

Maltese deputy Roberta Metsola hosted the Parliament Magazine's annual MEP awards ceremony recognising MEPs for their outstanding work over the last year.

Jean-Claude Juncker and Antonio Tajani EU leaders express hopes and fears in Rome
27 March 2017

EU leaders converged in Rome at the weekend to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the signing of treaty of Rome.

Jo Leinen at parliament 60 years after the treaty of Rome, a better Europe is possible
24 March 2017

A large majority of citizens do not fundamentally reject European unification - but the EU must do better, says Jo Leinen.

Related Partner Content

TTIP, US-EU relations PM+: TTIP: A foot in the door in Washington?
19 May 2015

TTIP will allow Brussels greater influence in Washington, argues Craig Willy.

Support needed for EU payments package
18 November 2013

Will the EU's 'payments package' help or hinder Europe's economic growth? Gilbert Arira asks.

Colonel Ahmet Zeki Ucok Turkey: Failed coup was years in the making
18 November 2016

The failed coup in Turkey was years in the making, writes Ahmet Zeki Üçok.