Study: EU lagging behind on climate finance commitments
A new study says the EU is lagging behind in helping poorer nations meet their climate action targets.
Photo credit: Adobe Stock
The EU and its member states, together with all other developed countries, have committed to mobilise up to €80bn annually by 2020 onwards to support poor and vulnerable countries around the world in their efforts to deal with climate change.
But 'An analysis of climate finance aid' by ACT Alliance, a climate action advocacy group, is highly critical of the EU’s efforts so far.
ACT Alliance EU’s director, Floris Faber, said, “People who are living in poverty and in vulnerable conditions around the world face the impacts of climate change in their everyday life.
“In spite of their limited contributions to global emissions, they are the ones who suffer first and most when drought, floods and hurricanes become stronger in the wake of climate change.”
The EU has committed to support developing countries, however, it seems as though the EU has lagged behind in its commitment, said Faber.
Based on EU reporting on climate finance aid, the new study shows that the European Investment Bank (EIB) falls short of providing adequate support to help vulnerable countries adapt to climate change, missing its own target of 35 per cent of aid towards developing countries to be climate finance, with current levels at 27 per cent.
ACT Alliance says the European Commission, as well as the European Development Fund, have made progress on providing support to poor countries, as well as on reaching a balance between support for both climate change adaptation and mitigation.
However, the group goes on to say that the support from the EIB strongly favours mitigation in middle-income countries to the detriment of the much needed adaptation support in the most vulnerable countries.
As a result, only one third of the EU’s own total climate finance aid was spent on adaptation, it is claimed.
A high proportion of EU climate finance is delivered as loans, which means that developing countries will have to repay the support that they received.
In 2016, the EIB’s share of EU climate finance represents 41 per cent of the total of EU climate aid that is being reported.
Faber added, “Loans could play an important role, but it is not fair to count the money which developing countries are expected to repay. This is in contradiction with what overseas assistance is meant to be. In this case, the agreed support becomes a bill which poor people will have to pay.”
Climate finance aid does not go to the countries that are most in need, as the poorest countries are most dependent on external support.
From 2013 to 2016, 19 per cent of EU’s level climate aid was provided to the least developed countries (LDC) annually on average, a similar amount only for Turkey.
Turkey is by far the first recipient country of climate aid from EU. Among the top 10 recipient countries, Bangladesh comes seventh and is the only LDC.
Faber went on, “We were surprised to find that Turkey is by far, the biggest receiver of climate finance from the EU.
“I am sure that Turkey, and other rich developing countries could benefit from the support, but there is a large number of poorer and more vulnerable countries who have no chance to take action, unless they receive support. They should receive a bigger share of the funds coming from the EU.”
It’s neither wise nor safe for EU policymakers to dismiss new breeding techniques as ‘dangerous’ without any real consideration of the facts, argues Hannes Kollist.
Let’s focus on the man, not the ball, argues Jacob Hansen.
Animal Health Europe’s Roxane Feller provides a recap on the veterinary medicines and medicated feed review ahead of trilogue talks kicking-off this week on 31 January