EU warns Poland over judicial reforms while also reaching out with call for dialogue

Written by Martin Banks on 28 July 2017 in News
News

Greens MEP Sven Giegold has welcomed the European Commission’s ‘get tough’ response to Polish government plans to give politicians more power to sack and appoint judges.

Polish flag | Photo credit: Press Association


Greens MEP Sven Giegold has welcomed the European Commission’s ‘get tough’ response to Polish government plans to give politicians more power to sack and appoint judges.

On Wednesday, the Commission launched legal action against Poland saying it would be stripped of its EU voting rights if it went ahead with proposals to force all Supreme Court judges into retirement.

Poland's president has vetoed two of the most controversial bills, but the government wants to press on with them, despite mass street protests.

The Commission's Vice-President, Frans Timmermans, said the reforms would have a "very significant negative impact on the independence of the Polish judiciary".

He welcomed a decision by Polish President Andrzej Duda on Monday to veto some of the laws, including the one that would have overhauled the Supreme Court.

But Timmermans said the Commission would launch immediate action to strip Poland of its voting rights if Warsaw went ahead with it anyway.

Such a penalty, known as Article 7, requires the agreement of all EU member states, and Hungary says it will back Poland.

Reacting to the latest developments Greens group MEP Sven Giegold, the European parliament’s rapporteur on transparency, integrity and accountability of EU institutions, told this website, "The Commission has sent a clear signal to the Polish government without overstepping its legal possibilities.”

He added, “This is good news for the rule of law and European democracy. The independence of the judiciary is an indispensable part of the rule of law and democratic principles.”

"The Commission has sent a clear signal to the Polish government without overstepping its legal possibilities” Sven Giegold MEP

The German deputy went on, “Nevertheless, the government majority in Poland has enacted more laws which seem to violate EU law. Therefore, I have written to Timmermans to analyse these laws as well and to consider infringement procedures. The list of potential breaches of EU law is based on work of the Polish legal NGO 'Frank Bold'."

Further comment came from Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, who said: "The Commission is determined to defend the rule of law in all our member states as a fundamental principle on which our European Union is built. An independent judiciary is an essential precondition for membership in our Union.

“The EU can therefore not accept a system which allows dismissing judges at will. Independent courts are the basis of mutual trust between our member states and our judicial systems. If the Polish government goes ahead with undermining the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law in Poland, we will have no other choice than to trigger Article 7."

His comments were endorsed by Timmermans, who said: "Our Recommendations to the Polish authorities are clear. It is time to restore the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal and to either withdraw the laws reforming the judiciary or bring them in line with the Polish Constitution and with European standards on judicial independence.”

“Polish courts like the courts of all member states are called upon to provide an effective remedy in case of violations of EU law, in which case they act as the "judges of the Union" and must comply with the requirements of the independence of the judiciary in line with the Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. We want to resolve these issues together in a constructive way.”

Timmermans went on, “The Commission's hand remains extended to the Polish authorities for dialogue, and we welcome any steps to amend these laws in line with our recommendations."

About the author

Martin Banks is a senior reporter for the Parliament Magazine

Interested in this content?

Sign up to our free daily email bulletins.

 

Share this page

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

EU goes on offensive over controversial Polish judicial reforms
24 July 2017

MEP accuses Poland of “striking at the root of the rule of law” over a controversial set of laws that will give the country’s politicians control over its supreme court.

The Commission's transparency register strategy is extremely worrying
17 August 2017

Regardless of who you talk to, everyone agrees: a strong register is important. But when it comes to practice, things start to look a lot bleaker, writes Margarida Silva.

Related Partner Content

Between EU and Eurasia: Which future for human rights in Armenia?
2 December 2015

Armenia's abrupt political U-turn, clearly imposed by Moscow, has interrupted a number of promising legislative processes in the field of human rights.

The need to counter extremist propaganda more effectively
13 December 2016

There are different reasons why people believe in extremist ideologies or join extremist groups, explains Alexander Ritzmann.

PM+: EU lacking effective response to extremist online propaganda
30 September 2015

Who is controlling the counter-narratives to extremism? This is the question that many EU policymakers want answered, argues Tehmina Kazi.