ECA report: EU can and should do better to combat food waste

Written by Martin Banks on 23 January 2017 in News

The EU's spending watchdog says the EU "can, and should, do better" to combat food waste more effectively.

ECA report says EU can and should do better to combat food waste | Photo credit: Fotolia

Although a number of EU policies have the "potential" to combat food waste this is not being exploited, according to the European Court of Auditors.

The auditors say that, globally, food waste costs some €1.6trillion.

Their report says action taken to date "remains fragmented and intermittent" while coordination at European Commission level "is lacking."


The latest EU proposal for dealing with food waste "does not fully address the problem".

The audit report, 'Combatting food waste', says, "Food waste is a global problem which requires action at all levels. Current estimates indicate that, globally, around one third of the food produced for human consumption is wasted or lost. This waste represents huge economic and environmental costs."

Progress to date has been hampered by the lack of a common definition of 'food waste', and the lack of an agreed baseline from which to target reductions. 

This, says the report, is despite repeated calls from Parliament, Council, the Committee of the Regions, the G20 and others for the EU to help reduce food waste. 

"Our report to the Commission identified a number of missed opportunities and potential improvements which would not require new legislative initiatives or more public money", said Bettina Jakobsen, the member of the European Court of Auditors responsible for the report. 

"But by focusing its efforts on establishing a platform, the Commission again misses an opportunity to deal effectively with the problem. What we need now is better alignment of existing policies, better coordination, and a clear policy objective to reduce food waste."

The auditors' report examined how current policies could be used more effectively, recommending that the Commission should strengthen the EU strategy to combat food waste and coordinate it better, with an action plan for the years ahead and a clear definition of food waste; consider food waste in future impact assessments, and better align the different policies which can combat food waste; identify and resolve legal obstacles to food donation, encourage the further use of existing donation possibilities and consider how to encourage donation in other policy areas.

However, Jakobsen warned today that the new platform does not contribute significantly to food waste strategy, and that there was still no single, clear definition of food waste. 

"Our recommendations on how to develop future policy have either been ignored or only partially accepted, while the draft guidelines just pass the problem on to the member states", she added. 

In their report, the auditors examined EU action taken so far to reduce food waste and how the various policy instruments work. They found that the EU had not contributed to a resource-efficient food supply chain by combatting food waste effectively. 

Food waste is a problem along the entire food supply chain, say the auditors, and action should be targeted all along the chain. The emphasis should be put on prevention, as the benefits of avoiding waste outweigh the cost of dealing with it later. 

The Luxembourg-based auditors found that there had been a notable lack of assessment of the impact of EU policies on the fight against food waste.

Major policy areas such as agriculture, fisheries and food safety all have a role to play and could be used to combat food waste better.


About the author

Martin Banks is a senior reporter for the Parliament Magazine


Interested in this content?

Sign up to our free daily email bulletins.


Share this page



Related Partner Content

Anti-palm oil lobbies bending the EU’s will
30 July 2019

Youssef Kobo explains how anti-palm oil lobbies are hurting the environment and the EU’s poorest members

PM+: CCS 'only proven technology' for transitioning to low-carbon future
28 March 2014

Graeme Sweeney says carbon capture and storage (CCS) is the only technological option which can cost-efficiently manage the transition to a low-carbon future.

Getting to the Green Deal: Don’t rule out alternative fuels
20 January 2020

A coalition of vehicle manufacturers and fuel producers are calling for consistency in defining alternative fuels.